![]() Fowler’s edition fills this gap admirably. The only major commentary in English on this section of the poem had been the corresponding section of Cyril Bailey’s 1947 three-volume translation and commentary, 2 which had become dated because of the large quantity of subsequent work on Epicurean philosophy. This is a superb edition of Lucretius De Rerum Natura 2.1-332 and of great value to all Lucretius scholars.Īs the title of the edition indicates, Fowler’s commentary covers the section of the De Rerum Natura in which Lucretius discusses the motions of atoms and explains Epicurus’ three types of atomic motion: downward motion caused by the weight of the atoms, motion in all directions caused by collisions of atoms, and the “swerve” ( clinamen) of atoms, a random motion of the atoms in a minimum of space. 1 In the present work Fowler demonstrates his impressive, wide-ranging skills as a philologist, literary critic, and interpreter of ancient philosophy. ![]() Fowler was perhaps best known for his “postmodern” readings of Latin literature, many of which were collected in his Roman Constructions published in 2000. ![]() Don Fowler’s death in 1999 at the age of 46 was a great loss to the study of ancient poetry and philosophy, as we are reminded by this posthumous publication of a revised version of his 1984 Oxford doctoral thesis on Lucretius. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |